UEFA finds the main reason for the investigation has opened against Merih Demiral in an action he took during the match. This action is evaluated under the heading of inappropriate behavior by UEFA.
According to experts, it is stated that Merih’s gesture was actually an innocent show of joy and did not carry any negative meaning. However, the dominant view in the European media is that this gesture was misinterpreted and associated with racism.
It is stated that the inspector appointed by UEFA will examine the match representative report, evaluate the footage in detail and, if he decides to continue, he will also listen to Merih Demiral’s defense.
It is emphasized that Merih Demiral’s defense is of great importance. Merih, who must explain the reason for his action in detail, is also expected to try to correct the misperceptions in the European media.
Similar Examples and Injustice
- As a first example, UEFA is being criticized for not launching an investigation into Serbian football player Tadic’s Chetnik salute.
- As a second example, it is considered unfair that Xhaka and Shaqiri were penalised for making the double-headed eagle gesture representing their country, while similar gestures by other footballers went unpunished.
- In the third example, it is stated that while the lion gesture made by Dutch football player Weghorst after the goal is considered normal, it would be a great injustice if Merih Demiral were to receive a penalty in a similar situation.
Double Standards and UEFA’s Responsibility
It is stated that the actions of the Austrian spectators should be investigated by UEFA, but no steps have been taken in this regard. It is emphasized that UEFA should determine the issues of violence, racism, discrimination and speech, and that double standards should not be applied.
