Friend’s Ethical Dilemma
A friend of mine is an amateur painter. She holds a degree from a prestigious college where she excelled academically. Despite being healthy and able-bodied, she chose to pursue her passion for painting post-graduation. While aspiring to establish herself as a professional artist, she currently works part-time as a teacher. Coming from an upper-middle-class background, she has received some financial support from her parents. Although she maintains a modest lifestyle in a comfortable apartment with roommates and rents a separate art studio, I admire her dedication to her art.
Recently, my friend confided in me that she utilizes the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) for her food expenses. I am troubled by this revelation, perceiving it as a misuse of the welfare system, potentially depriving those in genuine need. When I voiced my concerns, she argued that she is not depriving anyone else of assistance. While there is no set limit on SNAP beneficiaries, I feel uneasy about her actions and the impact on others who may require the support more urgently.
Individuals from diverse backgrounds can face financial challenges and should be able to access social assistance. However, I question whether my friend, by not actively seeking full-time employment, relying on parental funds, and prioritizing her art, is ethically justified in receiving SNAP benefits. Recognizing the importance of artists in society, I acknowledge that E.B.T. card usage does not restrict spending solely to essential needs. Nonetheless, her situation raises ethical considerations for me. Is her conduct morally acceptable? — Name Withheld
Expert Opinion
From the Ethicist: To address this situation, one must first consider the friend’s eligibility for SNAP benefits. While state regulations determine eligibility, federal guidelines outline income thresholds and work requirements for able-bodied individuals without dependents. Volunteer activities can fulfill work requirements, and the program aims to provide support without mandating the highest-paying job. Assuming the friend meets eligibility criteria, including parental assistance, her enrollment may be valid.
Furthermore, the ethical dilemma revolves around the perception of utilizing public benefits. While SNAP aids numerous individuals without a set cap on recipients, concerns arise regarding the obligation to contribute to society based on individual capabilities. Accepting assistance when feasible could be seen as exploiting the efforts of working citizens, highlighting the interconnectedness of societal support systems and personal responsibility.
